Contradicting Expert Consensus on Safe Medical Practice

  • Content that contradicts local health authorities' or WHO guidance on the safety of certain vaccines deemed safe by health authorities.
  • Content that contradicts local health authorities' or WHO guidance on the safety of chemical and surgical abortion methods deemed safe by health authorities.
  • Promotion of alternative health practices deemed unsafe by local health authorities or the WHO, such as promoting alternative formulas for infants instead of breast milk or commercial formula and promoting alternative abortion methods instead of chemical or surgical methods deemed safe by health authorities.

Please keep in mind that these are just a few examples, and you should avoid posting any content that may violate these policies. Note that these policies also apply to external links in your content, including clickable URLs or verbal directions leading users to other sites in video or other forms.

 

Content that falls under educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic categories may be considered for allowance, even if it appears to violate our misinformation policies mentioned here. However, to be eligible, the content must provide supplementary context in the video, audio, title, or description. It is essential to note that this exemption does not permit the promotion of misinformation. The additional context may involve presenting countervailing perspectives from local health authorities or medical experts. Additionally, exceptions may be made if the content's purpose is to condemn, dispute, or satirize misinformation that violates our policies.